Review





Similar Products

96
Miltenyi Biotec antibody against n cam cd56
Antibody Against N Cam Cd56, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody against n cam cd56/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibody against n cam cd56 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Proteintech antibodies against ncam1
Antibodies Against Ncam1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against ncam1/product/Proteintech
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against ncam1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher antibodies against cd56 ma1-19129
a Representative immunohistochemical staining for <t>CD56,</t> CD68, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) at 2 h post-reperfusion. Upper panels show SCS-preserved kidneys; lower panels show HMP-preserved kidneys. Black line corresponds to 50 µm. b SCS-preserved kidneys in 2 h post-reperfusion had significantly higher infiltration of MPO positive neutrophils compared with HMP-preserved kidneys. There was no significant difference in <t>CD56-positive</t> cells (NK cells) and CD68-positive cells (macrophages) between SCS- and HMP-preserved kidneys in 1 h after transplantation. For each marker and preservation condition, five fields were analyzed per sample. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. HMP hypothermic machine perfusion, MPO myeloperoxidase, SCS static cold storage.
Antibodies Against Cd56 Ma1 19129, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against cd56 ma1-19129/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against cd56 ma1-19129 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher antibodies against cd56 ma119129
a Representative immunohistochemical staining for <t>CD56,</t> CD68, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) at 2 h post-reperfusion. Upper panels show SCS-preserved kidneys; lower panels show HMP-preserved kidneys. Black line corresponds to 50 µm. b SCS-preserved kidneys in 2 h post-reperfusion had significantly higher infiltration of MPO positive neutrophils compared with HMP-preserved kidneys. There was no significant difference in <t>CD56-positive</t> cells (NK cells) and CD68-positive cells (macrophages) between SCS- and HMP-preserved kidneys in 1 h after transplantation. For each marker and preservation condition, five fields were analyzed per sample. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. HMP hypothermic machine perfusion, MPO myeloperoxidase, SCS static cold storage.
Antibodies Against Cd56 Ma119129, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against cd56 ma119129/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against cd56 ma119129 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
Miltenyi Biotec antibodies against cd56
mRNA NK cell engineering and validation of cell viability and phenotype preservation. A) Confocal microscopy images of NK cells transfected with EGFP mRNA (25 µg mL −1 ), stained with 4’,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) for nuclear visualization (scale bars: 10 µm). B) Transfection efficiency and MFI fold change for EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells with varying mRNA concentrations ( N = three independent donors). C) Fluorescence intensity histograms of EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells at a concentration of 25 µg mL −1 via electroporation or hydroporation ( N cell = 5000 per sample). D) Transfection efficiency, MFI fold change, and NK cell yield for EGFP mRNA transfection using electroporation or hydroporation ( N = three independent donors). E) Relative viability of hydroporated NK cells assessed with 7‐AAD staining over 6 days. F) Fluorescence intensity histograms of <t>CD56</t> and CD94 immunostaining with phycoerythrin (PE)‐conjugated antibodies for the negative control and hydroporated NK cells after 24 h ( N cell = 5000 per sample). All bars represent mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student's t ‐test was used to compare the two experimental groups. n.s denotes no significant difference. Multiple comparisons were conducted using one‐way ANOVA. Student's t‐test was used to compare two experimental groups.
Antibodies Against Cd56, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against cd56/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against cd56 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
MultiSciences Biotech Co Ltd antibodies against cd56
mRNA NK cell engineering and validation of cell viability and phenotype preservation. A) Confocal microscopy images of NK cells transfected with EGFP mRNA (25 µg mL −1 ), stained with 4’,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) for nuclear visualization (scale bars: 10 µm). B) Transfection efficiency and MFI fold change for EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells with varying mRNA concentrations ( N = three independent donors). C) Fluorescence intensity histograms of EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells at a concentration of 25 µg mL −1 via electroporation or hydroporation ( N cell = 5000 per sample). D) Transfection efficiency, MFI fold change, and NK cell yield for EGFP mRNA transfection using electroporation or hydroporation ( N = three independent donors). E) Relative viability of hydroporated NK cells assessed with 7‐AAD staining over 6 days. F) Fluorescence intensity histograms of <t>CD56</t> and CD94 immunostaining with phycoerythrin (PE)‐conjugated antibodies for the negative control and hydroporated NK cells after 24 h ( N cell = 5000 per sample). All bars represent mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student's t ‐test was used to compare the two experimental groups. n.s denotes no significant difference. Multiple comparisons were conducted using one‐way ANOVA. Student's t‐test was used to compare two experimental groups.
Antibodies Against Cd56, supplied by MultiSciences Biotech Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against cd56/product/MultiSciences Biotech Co Ltd
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against cd56 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher antibodies against cd2, cd3, cd14, cd16, cd19, cd235a, cd56
mRNA NK cell engineering and validation of cell viability and phenotype preservation. A) Confocal microscopy images of NK cells transfected with EGFP mRNA (25 µg mL −1 ), stained with 4’,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) for nuclear visualization (scale bars: 10 µm). B) Transfection efficiency and MFI fold change for EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells with varying mRNA concentrations ( N = three independent donors). C) Fluorescence intensity histograms of EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells at a concentration of 25 µg mL −1 via electroporation or hydroporation ( N cell = 5000 per sample). D) Transfection efficiency, MFI fold change, and NK cell yield for EGFP mRNA transfection using electroporation or hydroporation ( N = three independent donors). E) Relative viability of hydroporated NK cells assessed with 7‐AAD staining over 6 days. F) Fluorescence intensity histograms of <t>CD56</t> and CD94 immunostaining with phycoerythrin (PE)‐conjugated antibodies for the negative control and hydroporated NK cells after 24 h ( N cell = 5000 per sample). All bars represent mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student's t ‐test was used to compare the two experimental groups. n.s denotes no significant difference. Multiple comparisons were conducted using one‐way ANOVA. Student's t‐test was used to compare two experimental groups.
Antibodies Against Cd2, Cd3, Cd14, Cd16, Cd19, Cd235a, Cd56, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against cd2, cd3, cd14, cd16, cd19, cd235a, cd56/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against cd2, cd3, cd14, cd16, cd19, cd235a, cd56 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Thermo Fisher antibodies against cd2, cd3, cd14, cd16, cd19, cd235a, and cd56
mRNA NK cell engineering and validation of cell viability and phenotype preservation. A) Confocal microscopy images of NK cells transfected with EGFP mRNA (25 µg mL −1 ), stained with 4’,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) for nuclear visualization (scale bars: 10 µm). B) Transfection efficiency and MFI fold change for EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells with varying mRNA concentrations ( N = three independent donors). C) Fluorescence intensity histograms of EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells at a concentration of 25 µg mL −1 via electroporation or hydroporation ( N cell = 5000 per sample). D) Transfection efficiency, MFI fold change, and NK cell yield for EGFP mRNA transfection using electroporation or hydroporation ( N = three independent donors). E) Relative viability of hydroporated NK cells assessed with 7‐AAD staining over 6 days. F) Fluorescence intensity histograms of <t>CD56</t> and CD94 immunostaining with phycoerythrin (PE)‐conjugated antibodies for the negative control and hydroporated NK cells after 24 h ( N cell = 5000 per sample). All bars represent mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student's t ‐test was used to compare the two experimental groups. n.s denotes no significant difference. Multiple comparisons were conducted using one‐way ANOVA. Student's t‐test was used to compare two experimental groups.
Antibodies Against Cd2, Cd3, Cd14, Cd16, Cd19, Cd235a, And Cd56, supplied by Thermo Fisher, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies against cd2, cd3, cd14, cd16, cd19, cd235a, and cd56/product/Thermo Fisher
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies against cd2, cd3, cd14, cd16, cd19, cd235a, and cd56 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-02
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a Representative immunohistochemical staining for CD56, CD68, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) at 2 h post-reperfusion. Upper panels show SCS-preserved kidneys; lower panels show HMP-preserved kidneys. Black line corresponds to 50 µm. b SCS-preserved kidneys in 2 h post-reperfusion had significantly higher infiltration of MPO positive neutrophils compared with HMP-preserved kidneys. There was no significant difference in CD56-positive cells (NK cells) and CD68-positive cells (macrophages) between SCS- and HMP-preserved kidneys in 1 h after transplantation. For each marker and preservation condition, five fields were analyzed per sample. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. HMP hypothermic machine perfusion, MPO myeloperoxidase, SCS static cold storage.

Journal: Communications Medicine

Article Title: Hypothermic machine perfusion prevents hyperacute graft loss in pig-to-primate kidney xenotransplantation after 5-hours of cold Ischemia

doi: 10.1038/s43856-025-00842-6

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Representative immunohistochemical staining for CD56, CD68, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) at 2 h post-reperfusion. Upper panels show SCS-preserved kidneys; lower panels show HMP-preserved kidneys. Black line corresponds to 50 µm. b SCS-preserved kidneys in 2 h post-reperfusion had significantly higher infiltration of MPO positive neutrophils compared with HMP-preserved kidneys. There was no significant difference in CD56-positive cells (NK cells) and CD68-positive cells (macrophages) between SCS- and HMP-preserved kidneys in 1 h after transplantation. For each marker and preservation condition, five fields were analyzed per sample. Error bars indicate the standard error of the mean. HMP hypothermic machine perfusion, MPO myeloperoxidase, SCS static cold storage.

Article Snippet: To assess immune cell infiltration, immunohistochemical staining was performed using antibodies against CD56 (MA1-19129, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA; 500:1 dilution), CD68 (sc20060, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA; 300:1 dilution), and myeloperoxidase (ab188211, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA; 1000:1 dilution).

Techniques: Immunohistochemical staining, Staining, Transplantation Assay, Marker, Preserving

mRNA NK cell engineering and validation of cell viability and phenotype preservation. A) Confocal microscopy images of NK cells transfected with EGFP mRNA (25 µg mL −1 ), stained with 4’,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) for nuclear visualization (scale bars: 10 µm). B) Transfection efficiency and MFI fold change for EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells with varying mRNA concentrations ( N = three independent donors). C) Fluorescence intensity histograms of EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells at a concentration of 25 µg mL −1 via electroporation or hydroporation ( N cell = 5000 per sample). D) Transfection efficiency, MFI fold change, and NK cell yield for EGFP mRNA transfection using electroporation or hydroporation ( N = three independent donors). E) Relative viability of hydroporated NK cells assessed with 7‐AAD staining over 6 days. F) Fluorescence intensity histograms of CD56 and CD94 immunostaining with phycoerythrin (PE)‐conjugated antibodies for the negative control and hydroporated NK cells after 24 h ( N cell = 5000 per sample). All bars represent mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student's t ‐test was used to compare the two experimental groups. n.s denotes no significant difference. Multiple comparisons were conducted using one‐way ANOVA. Student's t‐test was used to compare two experimental groups.

Journal: Advanced Science

Article Title: Advancing Allogeneic NK Cell Immunotherapy through Microfluidic Gene Delivery

doi: 10.1002/advs.202412544

Figure Lengend Snippet: mRNA NK cell engineering and validation of cell viability and phenotype preservation. A) Confocal microscopy images of NK cells transfected with EGFP mRNA (25 µg mL −1 ), stained with 4’,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole (DAPI) for nuclear visualization (scale bars: 10 µm). B) Transfection efficiency and MFI fold change for EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells with varying mRNA concentrations ( N = three independent donors). C) Fluorescence intensity histograms of EGFP mRNA transfection in NK cells at a concentration of 25 µg mL −1 via electroporation or hydroporation ( N cell = 5000 per sample). D) Transfection efficiency, MFI fold change, and NK cell yield for EGFP mRNA transfection using electroporation or hydroporation ( N = three independent donors). E) Relative viability of hydroporated NK cells assessed with 7‐AAD staining over 6 days. F) Fluorescence intensity histograms of CD56 and CD94 immunostaining with phycoerythrin (PE)‐conjugated antibodies for the negative control and hydroporated NK cells after 24 h ( N cell = 5000 per sample). All bars represent mean ± standard deviation (SD). Student's t ‐test was used to compare the two experimental groups. n.s denotes no significant difference. Multiple comparisons were conducted using one‐way ANOVA. Student's t‐test was used to compare two experimental groups.

Article Snippet: To evaluate biomarker phenotype, PE‐conjugated monoclonal antibodies against CD56 and CD94 (Invitrogen), and NKG2A (Miltenyi Biotec) were used for immunofluorescence staining of NK cells.

Techniques: Biomarker Discovery, Preserving, Confocal Microscopy, Transfection, Staining, Fluorescence, Concentration Assay, Electroporation, Immunostaining, Negative Control, Standard Deviation